Today's US News & World Report has dueling op-eds by PCCC co-founder Stephanie Taylor and Blue Dog Congressman Jim Matheson on whether Democrats should be more progressive or more corporate.
Check out the excerpts below. Then, help our side win by sharing word about the "Bold Progressive" movement on Facebook and on Twitter.
Excerpt:
Democrats lost because they didn't fight strongly enough for popular progressive change—like a public health insurance option and a breakup of the big Wall Street banks that sunk our economy.
We commissioned a post-election national poll of those who voted. It showed that the 2010 electorate was much more conservative than the 2008 electorate. Many Democrats didn't show up. Neither did many independents who voted in 2008 for President Obama.
Why not? Because many who voted for "change we can believe in" no longer believed that Democrats would fight for that change. Consider what happened during the healthcare debate. A June 2009 New York Times poll showed that 87 percent of Democrats, 73 percent of independents, and half of Republicans favored a public option.
PCCC's Stephanie Taylor Tell friends about BoldProgressives |
While the beltway pundits counseled Democrats to run away from "the left," the policy supported by progressives was clearly the "center" of the country. Those who opposed the public option were on the fringe, out of touch with the mainstream.
Public option opponents included GOP Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, and independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut. Obama won those states by about 20 points in 2008, and voters there supported the public option by more than 2 to 1. Obama could have used his bully pulpit to pressure these senators—by flying to Maine and Connecticut to command local media attention, rally voters, and ask people to contact their senators. He could have fought, but he didn't.
Help our side win by sharing word about the "Bold Progressive" movement on Facebook and on Twitter.
Blue Dog Rep. Jim Matheson: Obama, Democrats Must Worry About the Center, Not the Left
Excerpt: (Show the full op-ed)
Democrats got whupped on November 2, and anyone who says otherwise is on another planet. In House races, Republicans gained over 60 seats—the second-largest net gain in the chamber by either party since World War II. The carnage was especially severe among moderate-to-conservative members of my caucus, including at least 23 of my fellow Blue Dogs. Because Blue Dogs traditionally represent the most competitive districts, they are always vulnerable. Despite their best efforts, the tidal wave—which most of us knew was coming—swept them out to sea.
Such a steep loss cries out for shaking things up on my side of the aisle. If a CEO presided over such a poor performance, he or she would be shown the door. The same is true for a coach whose team flounders on the field. That is why I have joined many of my colleagues in calling for change—starting at the top, with a new minority leader.
A quick glance at the exit-polling data tells you why staying with the status quo would be madness. Across almost every voting demographic, Democratic candidates were rejected. Women voters, senior voters, high school and college graduate voters, suburban and rural voters, and most strikingly, independent voters sent a loud and clear message that jobs and the economy are what matters.
What they didn't say is that they are enamored of Republicans . Polls show neither party in Congress is very popular. In my own district, what I heard time after time on the campaign trail is that both parties are guilty of engaging in too much bickering and not enough problem solving. Because many moderate voices in the House are now gone, I fear one scenario is that the atmosphere will become even more polarized.
Help progressives win by sharing word about the "Bold Progressive" movement on Facebook and on Twitter.